S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Infographic: Current Dividend Yield vs. Years of Consecutive Dividend Growth

My Money Blog has partnered with CardRatings and may receive a commission from card issuers. Some or all of the card offers that appear on this site are from advertisers and may impact how and where card products appear on the site. MyMoneyBlog.com does not include all card companies or all available card offers. All opinions expressed are the author’s alone.

A Dividend Aristocrat is a company in the S&P 500 index that has paid and increased its dividend payout every year for at least 25 consecutive years. You’re looking at companies that have had such reliable profits over multiple economic cycles that they can just keep sending checks to their shareholders every quarter while still not only maintaining but growing their business. Visual Capitalist just created a Dividend Aristocrat infographic that shows all 65 companies on the 2021 list, charted by current dividend yield and years of consecutive dividend growth.

Genuine Parts (GPC) and Dover Corp (DOV) have increased their dividend payout for 65 consecutive years!

Each year, some companies may be added or removed. For example, new in 2021 are IBM (IBM), NextEra Energy (NEE) and West Pharmaceutical Services (WST). Removed in 2021 are Raytheon (RTX), Carrier Global (CARR), Otis Worldwide (OTIS), Church and Dwight (CHD), and Stryker Corporation (SYK). Note that companies are sometimes removed because they were acquired by another company without the same dividend history.

I’ve always maintained a small side account where I own individual stocks and alternative investments. “Play Money”, “Mad Money”, “Fun Money”, whatever you want to call it. Even though it is only a small percentage of my net worth, I have enjoyed growing it over time and learning from the process. For example, I have found that in times of crisis, I am actually more comfortable buying more of the individual companies inside my self-directed account than buying my trusty broad index funds. I’m also a very low turnover investor, and usually make fewer trades per year than fingers on my hands.

I don’t solely buy companies on this list, but many of the companies are good research ideas if you like to learn about history. I prefer the idea of reliable and growing dividend income, not just momentarily “high” dividend yield. Of course, there are many solid companies that don’t satisfy the requirements for this list, and even list includes questionable companies will be eventually cut (like AT&T, which has already announced a future dividend cut even though still on this chart).

My Money Blog has partnered with CardRatings and may receive a commission from card issuers. Some or all of the card offers that appear on this site are from advertisers and may impact how and where card products appear on the site. MyMoneyBlog.com does not include all card companies or all available card offers. All opinions expressed are the author’s alone, and has not been provided nor approved by any of the companies mentioned.

MyMoneyBlog.com is also a member of the Amazon Associate Program, and if you click through to Amazon and make a purchase, I may earn a small commission. Thank you for your support.


User Generated Content Disclosure: Comments and/or responses are not provided or commissioned by any advertiser. Comments and/or responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser. It is not any advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Comments

  1. Johnathan,

    What are your thoughts of an ETF that includes the whole group like (NOBL)? Do you think this would be a better way to do index investing with dividends? (I heard that 50% of the gains of the S&P 500 were from dividends over a 10 year period so I figure doubling down on the dividend side might be fun.)

    • I think owning anything specific depends on if you really have faith in it, so if you own NOBL you should be focused on the steady and mostly increasing dividend and not the share price.

      That said, I would not be interested in paying a 0.35% expense ratio for a simple ETF of 50-65 stocks. You are giving up 18% of your dividend yield to ETF costs. I would rather own 50 stocks directly and keep all the dividend income. But that’s just me.

Leave a Reply to Jonathan Ping Cancel reply

*