<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monthly Net Worth &amp; Goals Update &#8211; December 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html</link>
	<description>Personal Finance and Investing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:43:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Net Worth &#38; Goals Update &#8211; March 2010 &#187; My Money Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-179922</link>
		<dc:creator>Net Worth &#38; Goals Update &#8211; March 2010 &#187; My Money Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-179922</guid>
		<description>[...] of Recent Updates Up until last December, I had done regular monthly updates of our net worth for five consecutive years. However, recent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Recent Updates Up until last December, I had done regular monthly updates of our net worth for five consecutive years. However, recent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-142847</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-142847</guid>
		<description>&quot;Personally, I’m shooting for $4.5M by age 59 (30 years from now), which will surprisingly only throw off $70,000 per year in today’s dollars, due to the inflation.&quot;

Of course that&#039;s all conjecture, but you have to take some kind of guess at what inflation will be like on average.  I believe I used 3.25% to calculate those numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Personally, I’m shooting for $4.5M by age 59 (30 years from now), which will surprisingly only throw off $70,000 per year in today’s dollars, due to the inflation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course that&#8217;s all conjecture, but you have to take some kind of guess at what inflation will be like on average.  I believe I used 3.25% to calculate those numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-142846</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-142846</guid>
		<description>bert: &quot;Assuming you are 35 (although, I think you are younger), it seems like you have more than enough post-60 nest egg already. Even at 6%, and no further contributions, you will have $1M by the time you can withdraw it.&quot;

Don&#039;t forget that $1M will not be in 25 years what it is today.  Even today, at a reasonable 4%, that&#039;s only $40,000 per year, which is not much if you want to enjoy your retirement.  Imagine what that will be like in 25 years.  Well, it will still be $40,000 :)... but it will *seem* like much less in today&#039;s dollars.  You get the picture.

Personally, I&#039;m shooting for $4.5M by age 59 (30 years from now), which will surprisingly only throw off $70,000 per year in today&#039;s dollars, due to the inflation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bert: &#8220;Assuming you are 35 (although, I think you are younger), it seems like you have more than enough post-60 nest egg already. Even at 6%, and no further contributions, you will have $1M by the time you can withdraw it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget that $1M will not be in 25 years what it is today.  Even today, at a reasonable 4%, that&#8217;s only $40,000 per year, which is not much if you want to enjoy your retirement.  Imagine what that will be like in 25 years.  Well, it will still be $40,000 <img src='http://cdn.mymoneyblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230; but it will *seem* like much less in today&#8217;s dollars.  You get the picture.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m shooting for $4.5M by age 59 (30 years from now), which will surprisingly only throw off $70,000 per year in today&#8217;s dollars, due to the inflation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DD</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141965</link>
		<dc:creator>DD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141965</guid>
		<description>Chad,

I&#039;m thinking about the scenario where your motivation to do a roth conversion or contribution now is because you believe income tax rates will rise significantly in the future, so you pay income taxes now to protect your future withdraws/income from those high rates. But down the road with the national government needing money, instead of (or in addition to higher income tax rates), the government institutes a VAT, so the investor&#039;s original motivation is no longer valid (the government gets more of your retirement money than you originally planned for).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking about the scenario where your motivation to do a roth conversion or contribution now is because you believe income tax rates will rise significantly in the future, so you pay income taxes now to protect your future withdraws/income from those high rates. But down the road with the national government needing money, instead of (or in addition to higher income tax rates), the government institutes a VAT, so the investor&#8217;s original motivation is no longer valid (the government gets more of your retirement money than you originally planned for).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141932</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141932</guid>
		<description>DD, not sure that makes any sense.  You would pay a VAT regardless of whether you use withdraws from a roth 401k or traditional 401k.  That is unless you are arguing that with a VAT they will lower income taxes (yeah right)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD, not sure that makes any sense.  You would pay a VAT regardless of whether you use withdraws from a roth 401k or traditional 401k.  That is unless you are arguing that with a VAT they will lower income taxes (yeah right)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DD</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141499</link>
		<dc:creator>DD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141499</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,

I&#039;m curious about your reasons for going with a roth conversion next year. I&#039;ve considered it as well, but believe that congress will find a way around the current advantage of roths (income tax free withdraws) by going with a  VAT or some other national sales tax. So with a conversion, you may end of paying taxes now to convert and taxes much later when you purchase something after withdrawing funds from a roth. Bottom line, our national government is going need to raise revenues eventually and they can only get money from people who have money, so they&#039;ll find a way. I have a roth 401k option which is nice, but I&#039;m not sure which is the better way to go with contributions for this same reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about your reasons for going with a roth conversion next year. I&#8217;ve considered it as well, but believe that congress will find a way around the current advantage of roths (income tax free withdraws) by going with a  VAT or some other national sales tax. So with a conversion, you may end of paying taxes now to convert and taxes much later when you purchase something after withdrawing funds from a roth. Bottom line, our national government is going need to raise revenues eventually and they can only get money from people who have money, so they&#8217;ll find a way. I have a roth 401k option which is nice, but I&#8217;m not sure which is the better way to go with contributions for this same reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yinna</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141444</link>
		<dc:creator>Yinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141444</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike, and Bert, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike, and Bert, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141377</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141377</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike!  That rule is a nice trick.  

I guess I should continue to max out my retirement accounts.  Although, there is the risk that the government will void the 72(t) exception.  However, I think this is remote.

Searching MMB, it looks like you have already thought about this, see http://www.mymoneyblog.com/archives/2007/07/early-retirement-planning-taking-early-withdrawals-without-penalty-from-your-401k-or-ira.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike!  That rule is a nice trick.  </p>
<p>I guess I should continue to max out my retirement accounts.  Although, there is the risk that the government will void the 72(t) exception.  However, I think this is remote.</p>
<p>Searching MMB, it looks like you have already thought about this, see <a href="http://www.mymoneyblog.com/archives/2007/07/early-retirement-planning-taking-early-withdrawals-without-penalty-from-your-401k-or-ira.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/arc.....r-ira.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141375</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141375</guid>
		<description>Interesting thought about not putting any more money into retirement accounts at all and just investing in regular taxable accounts once you hit a certain amount.  I don&#039;t think I ever thought about this.  Here is what I&#039;m thinking now:

Invest in retirement accounts until I reach an amount that would grow to about 700K to 1M by age 60.  Then invest the rest in taxable accounts until I have enough to quit working to the point where the regular taxable accounts can more than carry me to age 59.5.  I think you&#039;ve discussed this before but I didn&#039;t really give it much thought then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thought about not putting any more money into retirement accounts at all and just investing in regular taxable accounts once you hit a certain amount.  I don&#8217;t think I ever thought about this.  Here is what I&#8217;m thinking now:</p>
<p>Invest in retirement accounts until I reach an amount that would grow to about 700K to 1M by age 60.  Then invest the rest in taxable accounts until I have enough to quit working to the point where the regular taxable accounts can more than carry me to age 59.5.  I think you&#8217;ve discussed this before but I didn&#8217;t really give it much thought then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141366</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have the same question as bert - why invest so much in your retirment account if you want to use it a lot earlier?&quot;

The IRS rule 72(t) allows for substantially equal withdrawals from an IRA prior to age 59.5 without penalty.  There are a few formulas an account holder can choose and must keep the same plan for 5 years or until the person turns 59.5 whichever is longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have the same question as bert &#8211; why invest so much in your retirment account if you want to use it a lot earlier?&#8221;</p>
<p>The IRS rule 72(t) allows for substantially equal withdrawals from an IRA prior to age 59.5 without penalty.  There are a few formulas an account holder can choose and must keep the same plan for 5 years or until the person turns 59.5 whichever is longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yinna</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141361</link>
		<dc:creator>Yinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141361</guid>
		<description>I have the same question as bert - why invest so much in your retirment account if you want to use it a lot earlier?

For myself I have a similar concern - my family tends to not get very old and I so I want to be able to access my money whenever I please. I&#039;ve been using a regular brokerage account for my investments, for this reason. Sometimes I feel that this is not the smartest thing tax-wise but I&#039;d hate to see it disappear behind this 25 year barrier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same question as bert &#8211; why invest so much in your retirment account if you want to use it a lot earlier?</p>
<p>For myself I have a similar concern &#8211; my family tends to not get very old and I so I want to be able to access my money whenever I please. I&#8217;ve been using a regular brokerage account for my investments, for this reason. Sometimes I feel that this is not the smartest thing tax-wise but I&#8217;d hate to see it disappear behind this 25 year barrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141333</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141333</guid>
		<description>Love your blog!
Do you invest in gold and silver? Do you fear the shrinking dollar value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your blog!<br />
Do you invest in gold and silver? Do you fear the shrinking dollar value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer S</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141302</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141302</guid>
		<description>&quot;I simply picked what I felt is a conservative number based on recent comparables, $480,000, and keep it for at least 6 months if not a year. (Currently on month 3 out of 6.) For the most part I am concerned about mortgage payoff, which I still plan to accomplish in 20 years at most.&quot;

This is exactly what I do.  We&#039;ve already agreed on this before.  Thus, I&#039;m just taking up space in your comments. :)

(_8&#039;()</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I simply picked what I felt is a conservative number based on recent comparables, $480,000, and keep it for at least 6 months if not a year. (Currently on month 3 out of 6.) For the most part I am concerned about mortgage payoff, which I still plan to accomplish in 20 years at most.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is exactly what I do.  We&#8217;ve already agreed on this before.  Thus, I&#8217;m just taking up space in your comments. <img src='http://cdn.mymoneyblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(_8&#8242;()</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chedv</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141295</link>
		<dc:creator>chedv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141295</guid>
		<description>You are doing well, keep it up!

A concern I have recently (maybe because it&#039;s everywhere on the net) is the declining value of the US Dollar.  If the Dow goes to 30,000 but the dollar is worth less, do we really have anymore wealth?  Gold seems too high and who knows if it is a true measure of currency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are doing well, keep it up!</p>
<p>A concern I have recently (maybe because it&#8217;s everywhere on the net) is the declining value of the US Dollar.  If the Dow goes to 30,000 but the dollar is worth less, do we really have anymore wealth?  Gold seems too high and who knows if it is a true measure of currency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aa</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141291</link>
		<dc:creator>aa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141291</guid>
		<description>A $30K lump sum into stocks at this level, wow! The market has a P/E of 20, it&#039;s not terribly overpriced and is still about 20% away from being called a bubble by recent standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $30K lump sum into stocks at this level, wow! The market has a P/E of 20, it&#8217;s not terribly overpriced and is still about 20% away from being called a bubble by recent standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141289</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141289</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on holding so much money in retirement accounts at such a young age?  

Most of your retirement savings, ~$200k is in tax-sheltered accounts that can only be tapped at age 59.5.  Assuming you are 35 (although, I think you are younger), it seems like you have more than enough post-60 nest egg already.  Even at 6%, and no further contributions, you will have $1M by the time you can withdraw it.  

As I understand it, your goal is be financially independent long before you turn 60.  It seems like this will require more contributions to your non-tax-sheltered accounts, as they will have less time to grow.  

Just wondering what your thoughts are on this topic.  I am in a similar position and am already thinking about not putting anything in my Roth next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on holding so much money in retirement accounts at such a young age?  </p>
<p>Most of your retirement savings, ~$200k is in tax-sheltered accounts that can only be tapped at age 59.5.  Assuming you are 35 (although, I think you are younger), it seems like you have more than enough post-60 nest egg already.  Even at 6%, and no further contributions, you will have $1M by the time you can withdraw it.  </p>
<p>As I understand it, your goal is be financially independent long before you turn 60.  It seems like this will require more contributions to your non-tax-sheltered accounts, as they will have less time to grow.  </p>
<p>Just wondering what your thoughts are on this topic.  I am in a similar position and am already thinking about not putting anything in my Roth next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Sangl</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/monthly-net-worth-goals-update-december-2009.html#comment-141281</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Sangl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5977#comment-141281</guid>
		<description>Outstanding update - I am in the same boat with the house valuation.  I have decided to just leave it at the purchase price that I paid several years ago and leave it unchanged.

What company are you using to manage your taxable investment accounts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding update &#8211; I am in the same boat with the house valuation.  I have decided to just leave it at the purchase price that I paid several years ago and leave it unchanged.</p>
<p>What company are you using to manage your taxable investment accounts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 442/443 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.mymoneyblog.com

Served from: www.mymoneyblog.com @ 2012-02-11 19:27:26 -->
