<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Swensen&#8217;s Updated Model Asset Allocation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mymoneyblog.com/david-swensens-updated-model-asset-allocation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/david-swensens-updated-model-asset-allocation.html</link>
	<description>Personal Finance and Investing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:43:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maury</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/david-swensens-updated-model-asset-allocation.html#comment-183604</link>
		<dc:creator>Maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5983#comment-183604</guid>
		<description>Leaving off Corporate Bonds has nothing to do with trying to time the market and everything to do with the fact it is an asset class stacked against investors.  It tries to be safe and provide better returns, but those can be achieved by investing 50% in government bonds and 50% in equities getting you best of breed for safety and better returns.  Corporate bonds by their nature don&#039;t have their incentives aligned with investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving off Corporate Bonds has nothing to do with trying to time the market and everything to do with the fact it is an asset class stacked against investors.  It tries to be safe and provide better returns, but those can be achieved by investing 50% in government bonds and 50% in equities getting you best of breed for safety and better returns.  Corporate bonds by their nature don&#8217;t have their incentives aligned with investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betterment.com Review: Investing Made Simple, But Is It Worth The Cost? &#187; My Money Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/david-swensens-updated-model-asset-allocation.html#comment-180600</link>
		<dc:creator>Betterment.com Review: Investing Made Simple, But Is It Worth The Cost? &#187; My Money Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5983#comment-180600</guid>
		<description>[...] see a 50% split between TIP and some nominal Treasuries bonds like IEF or SHY. (As recommended by David Swensen.) More diversification, same high credit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see a 50% split between TIP and some nominal Treasuries bonds like IEF or SHY. (As recommended by David Swensen.) More diversification, same high credit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrsCasanova</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/david-swensens-updated-model-asset-allocation.html#comment-141360</link>
		<dc:creator>MrsCasanova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5983#comment-141360</guid>
		<description>I agree with matt about the interpretation of the economic condition. How long do you think it will be until the economy starts to recover?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with matt about the interpretation of the economic condition. How long do you think it will be until the economy starts to recover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/david-swensens-updated-model-asset-allocation.html#comment-141320</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5983#comment-141320</guid>
		<description>You could interpret economic condition to mean that the relative global market weight of REITs has dropped since 2005, and Emerging Markets has grown.  This allocation  reflects that.  

I always thought not rounding to the nearest 5% was silly anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could interpret economic condition to mean that the relative global market weight of REITs has dropped since 2005, and Emerging Markets has grown.  This allocation  reflects that.  </p>
<p>I always thought not rounding to the nearest 5% was silly anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.mymoneyblog.com/david-swensens-updated-model-asset-allocation.html#comment-141284</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymoneyblog.com/?p=5983#comment-141284</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ironic that developers of &quot;lazy&quot; portfolios make changes in light of recent events.  It seems the lure of performance chasing is just too powerful, even for those that know better.  A cap-weighted portfolio would adjust itself to these changing events, without needing anyone in the driver&#039;s seat.

Vanguard has something called the Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VTWSX).  It invests in the almost 3000 largest companies of the entire world (weighted by market capitalization), so your entire stock allocation could be that one fund.

Swenson&#039;s bond allocation is good, but restricting it to just government bonds implies something about the rest of the bond market.  50% total bond market index, and 50% would be more diversified, and have a better expected return (yes, with slightly more risk, but if your stock allocation is 15% REIT and 10% emerging markets, you are no stranger to risk).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ironic that developers of &#8220;lazy&#8221; portfolios make changes in light of recent events.  It seems the lure of performance chasing is just too powerful, even for those that know better.  A cap-weighted portfolio would adjust itself to these changing events, without needing anyone in the driver&#8217;s seat.</p>
<p>Vanguard has something called the Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VTWSX).  It invests in the almost 3000 largest companies of the entire world (weighted by market capitalization), so your entire stock allocation could be that one fund.</p>
<p>Swenson&#8217;s bond allocation is good, but restricting it to just government bonds implies something about the rest of the bond market.  50% total bond market index, and 50% would be more diversified, and have a better expected return (yes, with slightly more risk, but if your stock allocation is 15% REIT and 10% emerging markets, you are no stranger to risk).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 302/303 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.mymoneyblog.com

Served from: www.mymoneyblog.com @ 2012-02-11 19:31:01 -->
