Equity Asset Allocation: Comparison of 8 Model Portfolios
I’m still planning on reshaping my investments and continuing my choosing an asset allocation series, but Thanksgiving and work has thrown me off a bit.
To skip ahead a bit, here are several sample asset allocations from various sources for the equity (stock) side of your portfolio. I thought it would be helpful to see them all side by side and compare how different authorities might split things differently between domestic and international stocks, how they deviate from the “total” market indexes, and whether they choose to incorporate additional asset classes like real estate or commodities.
For more information about any specific portfolio and the source, just click on the pie chart.
Read more: Index of Posts On Building My Portfolio
Find more in Investing, Retirement | 12/10/07, 2:58am | Trackback
December 10th, 2007 at 4:58 am
Thanks for putting these all on one page. Is there any way to throw these weights into excel and figure out past historic returns on a 5, 10, 25, 30+ year basis?
December 10th, 2007 at 7:08 am
I have a healthy heterosexual Man Crush on Ben Stein. That guy is a freakin’ Genius!!
December 10th, 2007 at 7:44 am
Yeah, I like Ben Stein too. But only when it comes to matters of economics. Apparently his knowledge of science is limited , at best.
So it looks like AAAA and Random Walk are nearly identical. Interesting.
What about IFA funds ?
December 10th, 2007 at 8:34 am
Mancrushes should be reserved for people like Tony Romo…heh
I goof on this guy on work because he’s always gushing over the Dallas quarterback
-Raymond
December 10th, 2007 at 9:27 am
I know there are 10 gazillion allocation strategies, but you may want to check out coffeehouseinvestor.com (has book too of same name; I have no ties to either). He is all about keeping it simple and straight forward as well. His allocation showed only 2 down yrs since ‘91. Allocation is something like: 10% each: LC blend, LC Val, SM Blend, SC Val, Intl, REIT, 40% fixed. Yea, that fixed is hard to take and intl may be out of date, but he lists his 16 yr rtn as 11% so that works OK by my books…
December 10th, 2007 at 10:39 am
This kind of strategic asset allocation is just playing with numbers in the rear view mirror. If you accept the fact that over “intermediate” time periods — one to five years — a given market will move from undervalued to overvalued, why would you want to stick with any static (”strategic”) asset allocation? Just the fact that there are so many different allocation models should be a warning that none of them are a “holy grail.” One way to attack the undervalued/overvalued issue, and still use a static allocation (though I don’t think static is good for anyone) is to use a Research Affiliates-based index like the new series of ETFs from PowerShares using the FTSE/RAFI methodology. (Information only; I have no connection with PowerShares.)
December 10th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
These asset allocations are all very US-centric which seems like a dangerous game going forward.
Globalization is a technical and business reality and right now the US is the richest country in the world (and Canada, isn’t that far behind). By the very nature of “Globalization” this means that money will be flowing outwards from the US. Once you’re the biggest the only direction left to go is down.
Again, money is not flowing into the US, it’s flowing outwards, so that means that the highest growth region will necessarily be outside of the US. To that end, I think that it’s very relevant to incorporate “emerging markets” or at least incorporate US companies that benefit heavily from these “emerging markets”.
Many of these mixes seem to reflect a past where the USwas a growth market, but almost every sample portfolio is more than 50% invested in the US markets. It doesn’t take a psychic to know that more than 50% of the world’s economic growth over the next 10 years will be happening outside of the US. So why bet 70% of your portfolio on less than half of the world’s possible growth?
Of course, thanks Jonathan for the great collection of info. Very well-presented!
December 10th, 2007 at 8:59 pm
I use a modified version of the Margaritaville Portfolio and like it a lot. I have 40% in VTSMX, 40% in VGTSX, and 20% in VIPSX. Works well for me so far.
December 12th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
So 8 different portfolios based on 8 “expert” opinions, interesting. I was considering hiring a financial advisor/planner but honestly I don’t think anyone has the “correct” answer to help me construct my portfolio.
December 14th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
Great read! I can never get enough of asset allocation. The differences above are certainly indicative of the thinking on this topic. I have found the key to successful asset allocation is consistency over a long period of time.
BTW, I loved the pie chart graphics.
Best Wishes,
D4L
December 17th, 2007 at 12:02 pm
Count Cash as Part of Total Investment Portfolio?
For simplicity (and sanity) sake, my total investment portfolio consists of retirement (tax-advantaged), taxable, and cash. Are there many of you that count emergency fund cash as a part of your long-term portfolio? In other words, in a $1MM portfolio that is 90/10 stocks/bonds - is there any reason to not be 100% equity if you have 100k+ in HYS?
December 22nd, 2007 at 11:22 am
What’s everyones opinion on precious metals. What about bullion coins?
December 28th, 2007 at 11:49 am
Best portfolio analyzer I have come across is the instant X-Ray analyzer at Morningstar website. I entered my information in both that website and in Vanguard and the X-ray provides a better detailed view of the 9 box matrix. Vanguard just shows everything as a blend.
April 1st, 2008 at 5:02 am
[...] shares. Some advocate an even simpler 50/50 ‘lazy’ strategy. The excellent My Money Blog has a fantastic primer on different asset allocation models. It’s US focussed, but the principals will apply in other countries, [...]