Building My Portfolio: Efficient Frontier and Modern Portfolio Theory Friday, November 2nd, 2007
Building upon the idea of investing in broad markets, next up is Modern Portfolio Theory. This is another advanced topic that entire careers can be built around, but here is my attempt to explain it in one quick digestible chunk.
Risk vs. Reward
As far as investing goes, the most basic component we have is cash. If we invest it in a Treasury bill from the government (as riskless as possible), then we will end up with a return after inflation of zero. You just keep up with inflation. No risk, no reward. In order to increase our reward we, must take on more risk. But it’s not a linear relationship. We want to find the mix of investments that offer the best mix of risk and reward. So again we turn to history and whip up some math. (I’ll go easy on the numbers here.)
Reward = Return
The idea of reward is usually represented by the historical average annual return of the investment. Sounds good to me.
Risk = Standard Deviation
The idea of risk has many possible definitions. Stocks are seen as riskier as bonds, because their prices have historically fluctuated much more wildly. For example, for domestic stocks, your best year would be +39% while your worst year would be -28%. In contrast, for a broad bond portfolio, your best year would have been +31% while your worst year would be -8%. (Source: Vanguard) A mathematical way to measure this volatility is standard deviation. The larger the standard deviation, the higher the risk.
Mix ‘Em Up
An asset class is a group of investments that exhibit similar characteristics. If we plot their historical returns vs. historical standard deviations, we might get something like this:
One dot might be the S&P 500. Another dot might be 1-Year Treasury Bonds. Now, what if we starting mixing them up into in various ratios. Like taking 50% S&P 500, 25% US Small Cap, and 25% 5-Year Treasury Bonds. We’ll get a whole lot more dots, err… data points:
Read the rest of this entry…
)
